**Scroll Down**
Internet Basics
Online CommoditiesConsumer and Creator
1. Creator = Consumer2. The Active Consumer3. βCreator-GTMβ3.A. Where the Viral Things Are4. The Anonymous Economy5. Pre-founder: People-focused investingContent is King -- Bill Gates, 1997
Things To Do.
Work to Be DoneStatements; No Missionβ¬Β Creator Financing
Untraditional TalentVillains/Heroes, Love/TechnologyCreator Extras
Content is Eating the WorldA Spectrum of InfluenceInfluencing InfluencersInvestment
Total Content Market (TCM)/Content TAM (C-TAM)Revisiting Community InvestingRethinking Consumer LTVβOrganicβ = unpaid?Introducing: On-Page Collaboration, LiveWriting, anti-Press PublishVC Managers: Finding your styleWomenβs Consumer (2022)The βonlineβ buttonTranslation
βGenZβPersonal Journal
An intro to Personal JournalUnfortunately How to Build a FundI Donβt Want to Be YouAdvice for a Y1/Y2 woman in VCAdvice for a Y3 woman in VC My love letter to JournalistsWomen and Wikipedia ManifestoDating in Your IndustryAlcohol and VCInvest in the Opposition Not On Your SideCreator vs. Kinda βcreatorβForced Content.βPedigreeββLeversββCleanupββExamplesβMe & PaulVery Specific AdviceWhy I dropped outYoung PeopleHow to be JealousContent vs. JournalismTo Be FreeΒ© EM 2024
Rethinking Consumer LTV
I just know Iβm going to get roasted for this one.
Recently, I had someone grill me on the LTVs of a bunch of early 2010s consumer companies.
I realized in that moment that LTV, for me, couldnβt be as important at the earliest stages.
Whatβs the lifetime value of a Casper consumer?
What is the lifetime value of a Glossier consumer?
Well, people are very erratic. They are, most importantly and relevant to us, very erratic spenders.
But, telling this person that I didnβt care too much about LTV at the earliest stages didnβt go so well. So, I decided to write out exactly why I donβt really take LTV as seriously and why the notion of LTV being the most important metric in early-stage consumer investing might have caused for the early-stage consumer bubble of the 2010s that we cant take advantage of today.
LTV is supposed to tell you the true, either reoccurring or not, worth in effort to acquire that customer or, in the most extreme sense, decide if youβre even going to start or worse shut down that company.
Letβs play VC for a minute and decide based off of lifetime value per customer if this investment is a good idea.
First of all, this is an example used by a particular pair that I admire and like Justine and Olivia Moore. Letβs refer to their breakdown of Casperβs LTV from what we know publicly.
βWe can estimate a ~$765 AOV for Casper, given a $710 AOV for e-commerce and an $820 AOV for retail channels. Given refunds, returns, and discounts of $80M on gross revenue of $392M, we can calculate that ~20% of revenue is either refunded or discounted. We (conservatively) assume that 5% of this is true refunds and that discounts are already accounted for in AOV, and therefore adjust the AOV down to $727. Given Casperβs 16% repeat purchase rate (we assume 1 repeat order per repeat customer, which might not be accurate*), this gives us $843 in lifetime revenue per customer β at a 50.7% gross margin, this implies an LTV of $427.6.
- We also assume the AOV of the first order is the same as the AOV of the second order β the S-1 states that repeat customers βmost frequently return to purchase the same product.ββ
- Rethinking Consumer LTV