đź““

5. Pre-founder: People-focused investing

Internet Basics

đź““
Online Commodities

Consumer and Creator

đź““
1. Creator = Consumer
đź““
2. The Active Consumer
đź““
3. “Creator-GTM”
đź““
3.A. Where the Viral Things Are
đź““
4. The Anonymous Economy
đź““
5. Pre-founder: People-focused investing
đź““
5. Pre-founder: Nontechnicals

Creator Studies

đź““
1. Intro to Creator Studies
đź““
2. Creator Policy
🪟
2. View: Research
đź““
3. A Spectrum of Influence
đź““
4. Influencing Influencers

Investment

đź““
TCM/C-TAM
đź““
Rethinking Consumer LTV
đź““
“Organic” = unpaid?
đź““
Introducing: LiveWriting, anti-Press Publish
đź““
VC Managers: Finding your style
đź““
Women’s Consumer.
đź““
The “online” button

Translation

đź““
“GenZ”
đź““
Directory

Personal Journal

đź““
An intro to Personal Journal
đź““
Advice for a Y2/Y2 woman in VC
đź““
Advice for a Y3 woman in VC
đź““
My love letter to Journalists
đź““
Women and Wikipedia
đź““
“Pedigree”

© EM 2024

Pre-founder: People-focused businesses

Good talent is good talent. Getting back to basics: investing in talent.
đź’ˇ
Pre-founder: An individual with operational experience that fit expected qualities that would make for a good founder.
image

This is a formal proposition to relook at the ever growing and popular stage of “prefounder” and why your fund probably isn’t doing it.

Staging

My first few months full-time in VC happened around a VC bubble. As you can imagine, I didn’t care too much about it being that I was starting off at an emerging, pre-seed/seed/A-ish kind of firm. As time went on and I befriended some other investors that worked specifically at pre-seed-to-series-A, I found myself familiar to stage-specific, and most importantly price-specific funds. It always starts off with the price amount preferred.

We like to be one of the first (30) checks in.

Does not equate to:

We like to lead or semi-lead the absolute first round.

And at first, I thought this was all standardized: “Early….” “Earliest stages”, etc.

Had to mean whatever that first round is… because they want to work with that founder. Because they’re “worth the price.”

But, what I’ve come to find out is that stages are complete malarkey.

Define “talent”

talent: An individual person with expertise, and maybe network, in an industry.

Talent: A “star quality”, independently-thinking individual. An “it-factor” person with creativity and skill in a very specific space.

Why I care

In the startup ecosystem, “talent” has been broken up into two buckets: technical and nontechnical talent. Although there seems to be a never-ending shortage of technical talent, there’s no debate that almost half of venture dollars spent go to GTM and ads - and someone has to run that part.

My main petition is that there might be a shortage of GTM hires with enough product and SV context to really rip it.

Talent issues

There are also two main issues to talent, regardless of startup or not: recruitment and retention. For VC funds, in particular, retention in particular has been entirely difficult.

Fit

Founder→Market Fit: Founder has experienced the problem, has potential to sell accurately to potential Product→Market Fit: A product that solves a problem so well it generates demand within a market.

Founder→Customer Fit: Built in distribution to potential customers. This can be someone with a lot of followers or someone with a niche dentistry blog. Or a previous sales operator with a rolodex of potential customers. For this blog, I’m mostly thinking about a founder with online influence.